go to  ForumEasy.com   
The Sports Hub
Home » Archive » Message


[Email To Friend][View in Live Context][prev topic « prev post | next post » next topic]
  heap nike air max classic bw
 
Subject: heap nike air max classic bw
Author: xiaoming
Posted on: 12/08/2015 02:18:09 AM

When the man awakens to the new paradigm it is the mechanistic conception of Newton and Descartes to a holistic and ecological vision (Capra comprar zapatillas nike shox nz , 1996, p.13), let the values anthropocentric and egocentric values in pursuit of the vision of interdependence and makes It is part of everyday life, a fundamental change in our thoughts, perceptions and values. Studies clarify what is a paradigm. Thomas Kuhn in the Structure of Scientific Revolutions gives two meanings to the word paradigm. The first, wider, has to do with a whole constellation of opinions, values and methods etc... attended by members of a society, founded a discipline by which the company is directed to itself and holds the set of their relations. The second, narrower, and is derived from the first means of reference examples, the solutions of problems, taken and held as copies and replacing the explicit rules in solving other problems of moral science (Kuhn, 1970 nike shox nz baratas , apud BOFF , 2004). By comparison between the concepts can be taken as the first concept that is most similar to the studies discussed in this work. The refusal by demean the Earth to a series of natural resources or a reservoir of physical and chemical raw materials as Boff (2004, p. 27), is that the base in pursuit of the new paradigm, to feel the need to use new science and technology to nature, justifying the choice of the concept of paradigm given by Kuhn. Created by the mechanistic view of scientific revolution represented by Copernicus, Descartes, Bacon, Newton, Galileo describes the world as a machine driven by mathematical laws. The evolution of human thought, the disclosure of chemical processes unmasking the functioning of living organisms has not been able to overthrow the Cartesian paradigm. The art, literature and philosophy were the initial trigger of the real opposition to this dominant paradigm, with Lavoisier, William Blake nike shox turbo 2015 , Goethe, Kant and Hutlon begin to differentiate between living organisms as self reproduction and self organization and see the integration between the parties and the Planet (Capra, 1982). In the most remote times, the references to Greek and Roman on Earth were emotional, as Boff describes: Everything was full of respect and veneration, because they saw things as simple inert beings, but full of meaning and irradiation. The Earth, in the various expressions of Great Mother, of cultivated land and home, was seen as a living organism. It cannot be violated or predators. Otherwise if revenge by storms, lightning, droughts, fires, earthquakes and volcanoes [...] The man had a relationship of reverence and awe in the face of Mother Earth. (1999 nike shox mexico , p. 64) According to the author, this feeling was never completely lost in humanity. Spirits were always sensitive to magic and the enchantment of nature, even in modern times that the world massacred and reduced to a container of resources to be exploited by technology. In today this feeling resurfaces from the so called science of the Earth. They also tend to see more and more the Earth as Gaia , a live, super organism highly organized and balanced with subtle, always fragile and always on repeat, as the theory says the scientist of NASA, Lovelock (1991). The systemic thinking may have been launched from the biological view of the problem observed by biologists of the early XX century. For Capra (1996), with the systemic view the properties of an organism or living system, are properties of a whole that no party has. Arise from interactions between the parties; if it is dissected in isolated elements, these properties are destroyed. The systemic thinking has revolutionized the scientific thought, awakened by the impact that comes from the perception that the systems cannot be understood by analysis of its parts, but in a broad, contextual nike shox baratas , analytical thinking is the opposite, that to understand anything we must isolate it. The paradigm shift from mechanistic thinking to systemic thinking leads to reflect on the materialist philosophy in which human beings came to believe the matter as one consistent reality, all phenomena are secondary derivations thereof. For systemic thinking the matter can be seen in another form, such as energy, the matter is not simply material but stabilized energy, full of complex interactions, citing Boff (1999, p.24). Even states that matter, the philology of the word suggests, is the mother of all things, even the life that is self organization of matter. The foundations for the creation of dominant paradigms emerged today of the main philosophical currents initiated from the modern era (XVII century) and the development of science. These generated models of development incompatible with the ecological balance in the process of civilization of the West, which finally broken this environmental crisis. Turn led to the contemporary society of the century. XX, the environmental thinking. The historical background of the main philosophical and scientific currents that influenced the formation of environmental thinking mean to say that these have led to concepts, models and forms of reasoning peculiar adidas springblade mujer , or different paradigms. Highlight the most relevant paradigms of Modern Age to the present day. Cartesian philosophy was in the focus of intervention in nature is now observed, as to meet her for her use, control and dominate, drawing from the power of human reason over nature (CHAU锟? 1997). Emphasizes that as to understand the intelligence of the things from principles, are the means to dominate them. Descartes said that science must become the masters of human nature and the world. So they have the power to dominate nature through scientific knowledge, being the master s owners of nature, not its slaves (JAPIASSU, 1992). It is also called the mechanistic philosophy, which includes the world as a machine, ie, the phenomena can be explained by mechanical devices. Argues that the universe is transparent look of the .



References:

 


 
Powered by ForumEasy © 2002-2022, All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
 
Get your own forum today. It's easy and free.